Anatoly (staff) wrote:Hey guys,
Just want to give you the little heads up: in few weeks we`ll have minor update that will contain improvement of the initially requested automatic recover after system black out.

This is a fantastic new! If you need a beta tester I'm ready to assist you!

Simon

:) That's fine. Let us do some homework here and I hope we'll keep everybody happy. PS. Apologies for teaching granny to suck eggs but I just want this to work ;-) Also, appreciate split-brain is a risk but I think the above circumvents this. Hello everyone, I'm opening again this discussion to und...

Simon that's exactly how it works now... Automatic find out who has the most recent copy of data and then that node feeds updates to partners. Also manual intervention is allowed (operator can point forcibly to node with the most recent version of content HE THINKS should be the "master" ...

I've discussed the situation with developers and it looks like there's a major confusion as my information was a bit outdated: I'd like to propose my idea, just my 2 cents, on how to manage this kind of situation. You wrote that each node sharing the storage is able to log the time of the last upda...

There are too many people who complain so we'll come up with some sort of the solution soon. Both built-in and scriptable (so deployment engineer could come up with an own one). Let me have a meeting early next week and I'll post an update. Thanks! That really sounds great! :D :D :D Waiting for an ...

I'm testing the Virtual San in HA configuration, using a couple of Windows Server 2012-R2 PC that share 10GB of storage. On this shared storage I installed a Postgres database. Performance of this config is good for my scope, everything works fine on database client side, the only problem is related...