Search found 4 matches

by Mitmont
Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:58 pm
Forum: StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) [+Free], HCI Appliance (HCA), Virtual HCI Appliance (VHCA) [+Free], StarWind x Proxmox VE SAN Integration Services
Topic: Starwind virtual SAN free - Performanceproblems
Replies: 23
Views: 97530

Re: Starwind virtual SAN free - Performanceproblems

Hello this thread. If I may add to this. In our case 2012R2 with UI, Dell servers with high throughput NICs. What we came across was an issue when we hit a certain number of VMs we started to receive tons of Excessive Flush Cache messages. We saw this using WireShark on one of the members. We saw it...
by Mitmont
Tue Dec 26, 2017 12:22 am
Forum: StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) [+Free], HCI Appliance (HCA), Virtual HCI Appliance (VHCA) [+Free], StarWind x Proxmox VE SAN Integration Services
Topic: Version 11818 release notes clarification
Replies: 1
Views: 4749

Version 11818 release notes clarification

Can you provide more detail concerning this statement in the release notes:
What is the "Client" that is being referred to in the Synchronous replication area of the Release Notes:
"Clients must be disconnected before switching the device to the maintenance mode"

Thanks
by Mitmont
Tue Apr 11, 2017 10:11 pm
Forum: StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) [+Free], HCI Appliance (HCA), Virtual HCI Appliance (VHCA) [+Free], StarWind x Proxmox VE SAN Integration Services
Topic: LSFS L1 and L2 cache sizes
Replies: 1
Views: 15300

LSFS L1 and L2 cache sizes

Hello and thanks for the forum site to get answers. This question is about the correct amounts of L1 and L2 cache for a 9TB LSFS device. I know the max LSFS disk is 11TB. I know that we need to plan for the 300% usage so we're planning on a 3TB size useable space. We will enable Dedup. I also have s...
by Mitmont
Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:42 am
Forum: StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) [+Free], HCI Appliance (HCA), Virtual HCI Appliance (VHCA) [+Free], StarWind x Proxmox VE SAN Integration Services
Topic: Poor performance
Replies: 15
Views: 64503

Re: Poor performance

I have the same type of issue where the performance of the members of our node is very poor. In Resource Monitor we see 300-1000ms latency response times, In the VMs is even worse and user experience is very poor. After moving the disks to the second member, rebooting, returning the disks to the new...