Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version
Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)
-
eickst
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:25 am
Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:18 pm
So I've been having issues with Starwind performance being, well pretty bad and I have stumbled across an interesting discovery.
fyi Product is Native San for Hyper-V, 2 nodes, both severs are dell pe720 with 192GB ram, 6 disk 840 Samsung Pro in Raid 10, 10gbit connection for sync, separate 10gb for iscsi.
What I found was that if I created a ramdisk on server A, and connected to it via the MS iSCSI iniator, and ran ATTO benchmark (or any other benchmark for that matter) performance was lower than a local mechanical hard disk! BUT!!!! If I connected the same ram disk to Server B over the 10gbit link, the performance was MUCH higher. Please see the attached photo.
So my dilemma is....how do I fix this? I do not want to have to spin up 2 additional servers just for storage, that was the whole point of using the "Native" SAN for Hyper-V.
-
Attachments
-

- What a difference! Local should be faster, right? But it isn't.....something is off!
- Atto.png (39.53 KiB) Viewed 19883 times
-
eickst
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:25 am
Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:48 pm
Just as an additional note- same performance issues with the SSD array-
-
Attachments
-

- Atto2.png (26.98 KiB) Viewed 19878 times
-
eickst
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:25 am
Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:51 pm
And here is the SSD array without using Starwind. Quite a bit of difference.
-
Attachments
-

- atto3.png (19.23 KiB) Viewed 19875 times
-
anton (staff)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
-
Contact:
Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:13 pm
TCP loopback within Windows is SLOW. We've applied special optimization technique to boost loopback performance dramatically. This will be included with the upcoming version. If you'd like to test it now (it's a stand-alone component so no need to change anything) we can "leak" you premature version.
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev
Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

-
eickst
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:25 am
Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:44 pm
Well I had this on Server 2012 beforehand with similar issues, and I was under the impression that Server 2012 had much much faster loopback as it never made it all the way to the TCP/IP stack like it does in server 2008.
But if you want to 'leak' me something to see if it will fix it I will be more than happy to try it out! This gear isn't in production yet and I am going to keep it that way until we have everything ironed out
-
anton (staff)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
-
Contact:
Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:48 pm
Yup. 2012 is faster and different. But you need to "tweak" it. Unfortunately it's not just a registry setting or whatever. See this:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archi ... -path.aspx
Drop a line to
support@starwindsoftware.com with a link to this thread and guys will help with a test package.
eickst wrote:Well I had this on Server 2012 beforehand with similar issues, and I was under the impression that Server 2012 had much much faster loopback as it never made it all the way to the TCP/IP stack like it does in server 2008.
But if you want to 'leak' me something to see if it will fix it I will be more than happy to try it out! This gear isn't in production yet and I am going to keep it that way until we have everything ironed out
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev
Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

-
eickst
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:25 am
Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:18 pm
anton (staff) wrote:Yup. 2012 is faster and different. But you need to "tweak" it. Unfortunately it's not just a registry setting or whatever. See this:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archi ... -path.aspx
Drop a line to
support@starwindsoftware.com with a link to this thread and guys will help with a test package.
eickst wrote:Well I had this on Server 2012 beforehand with similar issues, and I was under the impression that Server 2012 had much much faster loopback as it never made it all the way to the TCP/IP stack like it does in server 2008.
But if you want to 'leak' me something to see if it will fix it I will be more than happy to try it out! This gear isn't in production yet and I am going to keep it that way until we have everything ironed out
Well that makes sense. Well 2012 seems to have a littany of issues any way so I am not surprised it takes more to get it to work. You can't even back the thing up with their own product (DPM) if you use CSV....
Email sent. I hope this resolves my issue. I couldn't believe how fast it was to a remote server when I took the local out of the mix. If I can have TWO connections that fast then I will be in business!
Thanks!
-
Max (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:03 am
Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:41 am
Just got an update from our R&D, looks like the loopback accelerator will be available for download as soon as next week.
I'll keep you posted!
Max Kolomyeytsev
StarWind Software