Limitations/Differences between HA and RAID-1 device

Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version

Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)

Post Reply
epalombizio
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:40 pm

Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:15 pm

All,
The documentation is a little light on differences between HA and RAID-1 devices.

From what I can gather, the main benefit of the HA device is that both targets can be active concurrently. Also, the ability to sync to a 3rd host is a benefit.

With RAID-1, is the backup target accessible while it is receiving replicated data from the primary? I would imagine not.

Any info other than what's in the documentation would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Elvis
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:51 pm

HA is fault tolerant (with one node going down second one keeps handling I/O so client notices nothing) and RAID1 is not (primary node goes down - downtime).
So RAID1 is a one-way synchronous replication and HA is two-way. Making long story short: we'll be replacing RAID1 with async replication in upcoming V8 making RAID1
mode within StarWind obsolete.
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
epalombizio
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:40 pm

Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:54 pm

Thanks for the quick response. I won't waste my time with Mirror then in configuration planning.

On to v8!
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:21 pm

That's a good idea!
epalombizio wrote:Thanks for the quick response. I won't waste my time with Mirror then in configuration planning.

On to v8!
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
Post Reply