Optimal Configuratrion

Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version

Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)

Post Reply
User avatar
kspare
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:23 pm

Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:21 pm

I am running server 2012 with 32gb ram, 12disk array.

What is the optimal configuration for performance with single node?

It sounds like the virtual disk is recommended to be faster than a raw disk?

What about cluster size of the windows partition the vdisk sits on?
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:34 am

Single-node configuration is not recommened as it's not safe to use a write back cache which is a huge performance booster. So at least dual node HA is recommended for production.

Yes, we don't use OS file system for anything except actual data allocation (all I/O is done in pass thru mode and we keep own block cache for L1 in RAM and L2 in flash) so virtual disk is faster then a raw disk
because of the advanced data commit technique we use (would be even more the case for upcoming V8 with its ability to do a log-structuring with LSFS).

Cluster size does not matter as we don't do file I/O with the file system services.
kspare wrote:I am running server 2012 with 32gb ram, 12disk array.

What is the optimal configuration for performance with single node?

It sounds like the virtual disk is recommended to be faster than a raw disk?

What about cluster size of the windows partition the vdisk sits on?
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
Post Reply