Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version
Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)
-
rrnworks
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:50 pm
Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:40 pm
Hello,
After reading through the resources and forum, we still have some questions:
1. What is the 'minimum' number of gigabit nics needed for a 2 node native san hyperv cluster? It looks like just two per this document:
http://www.starwindsoftware.com/custome ... yper-V.pdf
2. Beyond the minimum number of nics, if we could add just one more nic what would you assign it to and why (ie. sync channel for performance)?
3. We will be setting up a single RAID10 LUN on each node. How would you suggest partitioning this if at all?
Thanks!
Chris
-
Anatoly (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:28 am
-
Contact:
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:49 am
Hi!
1.After reading through the resources and forum, we still have some questions: What is the 'minimum' number of gigabit nics needed for a 2 node native san hyperv cluster? It looks like just two per this document:
http://www.starwindsoftware.com/custome ... yper-V.pdf
StarWind require having at least two NICs per each server (with the same bandwidth of course) - one for SyncChannel and one is for HeartBeat plus iSCSI client traffic. Please note that you will need extra NIC for Hyper-V purposes.
2. Beyond the minimum number of nics, if we could add just one more nic what would you assign it to and why (ie. sync channel for performance)?
I would:) As I mentioned before I'd add 1 NIC for Hyper-V traffic (bandwidth is not important here from the starwind side) and one for the SyncChannel, that allows you to use RR NLB policy and fully utilize network resources (bandwidth should be identical to first two ones)
3. We will be setting up a single RAID10 LUN on each node. How would you suggest partitioning this if at all?
No matter - RAID 10 is perfect. Just don`t put host OS on it.
Best regards,
Anatoly Vilchinsky
Global Engineering and Support Manager
www.starwind.com
av@starwind.com
-
rrnworks
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:50 pm
Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Good explanation, thank you. Two more questions to clarify:
1) When you say for hyper-v purposes, are you referring to a dedicated nic for hyper-v management? And all LAN traffic would still go through the heartbear nic, correct?
2) Is it not possible to include the host os on the primary partition of the raid 10? For new servers today, it is generally acceptable to make just one big RAID 10 and partition it out to include the host os.
-
jeddyatcc
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:52 pm
Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:03 pm
1. I think he means for Virtual Machine traffic. I use the heartbeat nics for cluster/management traffic, but I dedicate 1 port to VM Switch and 1 to Sync Channel. So basic answer for me is 3 NIC's/
2. Not really recommended for Virtual Machine Hosts or iSCSI, in my experience there are too many random reads as it is, and you want every IOP you can get for your VMs. If you are only going to be running 1-2 boring sleepy VMs this really isn't a problem, but the second one of them get's busy...
-
Anatoly (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:28 am
-
Contact:
Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:03 pm
jeddyatc, you are absolutelly correct again
rrnworks, is there anything else that we can assist you?
Best regards,
Anatoly Vilchinsky
Global Engineering and Support Manager
www.starwind.com
av@starwind.com
-
rrnworks
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:50 pm
Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:35 pm
Thanks for the info - I think I almost have it figured out:
1) The heartbeat NIC could also be used for the VM switch if you only had two NICs?
2) If you use the hearbeat NICs for cluster/management traffic, I take it you are connecting each to a switch (and not direct NIC to NIC)?
Chris
-
Anatoly (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:28 am
-
Contact:
Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:11 am
1) The heartbeat NIC could also be used for the VM switch if you only had two NICs?
HearTbeat is low resource consuming, so it wont affect any other traffic that will run on the same NICs
2) If you use the hearbeat NICs for cluster/management traffic, I take it you are connecting each to a switch (and not direct NIC to NIC)?
Yes, exactly.
Best regards,
Anatoly Vilchinsky
Global Engineering and Support Manager
www.starwind.com
av@starwind.com
-
jeddyatcc
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:52 pm
Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:15 am
Yes my nodes are across campus so I don't have the option of direct connect. I honestly wouldn't use nativesan on a server with only 2 NICs, but I also tend to overload my VM clusters as I build them lol.
-
Anatoly (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:28 am
-
Contact:
Mon Feb 11, 2013 12:49 pm
rrnworks, have you got any update for us, or some additional questions?
Best regards,
Anatoly Vilchinsky
Global Engineering and Support Manager
www.starwind.com
av@starwind.com