Virtual Disk vs Redirected Device

Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version

Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)

Post Reply
User avatar
kspare
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:23 pm

Sat Sep 14, 2013 4:06 am

We aren't doing any HA, we just want FAST storage, is there an advantage to using a vdisk over a redirected device?
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:15 pm

1) Single node device with our concept and architecture is slower then HA. For a simple reason: with MPIO read and write requests are served by multiple nodes @ the same time. So performance increases with the scale-out.

2) We'll represent single + async replication with V8.
kspare wrote:We aren't doing any HA, we just want FAST storage, is there an advantage to using a vdisk over a redirected device?
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
User avatar
kspare
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:23 pm

Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:14 am

Fair enough, but we won't be using HA.

So what are the best settings to get the best performance out of a single node?
User avatar
Anatoly (staff)
Staff
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:28 am
Contact:

Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:09 am

Well, it pretty simple then - give it as much RAM as possible to run cache, put SW VDs on the fast disks or RAID, and make sure that network part will not be the bottleneck. That should do the work.
Best regards,
Anatoly Vilchinsky
Global Engineering and Support Manager
www.starwind.com
av@starwind.com
Post Reply