SAS HBA vs. SAS RAID

Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version

Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)

Post Reply
kevrags
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:11 pm

Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:35 pm

I know there is a sticky about this, but it's a couple of years old now, so figured I'd ask again.

Building a hyper-converged FatTwin setup from Supermicro. Initial disks are 4x Micron S630DC 800GB 12Gbs SAS SSDs per node, RAID10. They come with an onboard LSI 3008 12GB/s SAS controller. So, the question is whether or not that is good enough - based on the sticky SW recommends using their Cache vs. RAID onboard - or to go with an LSI 3108 RAID controller.

Thanks,

Kevin
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:17 am

It's possible to use both. NV cache on LSIs and StarWind DRAM with UPS back-end. You'll have to do a lot of testing to make sure you don't have longer I/O path for all I/Os while saving some ms on I/Os in cache.
kevrags wrote:I know there is a sticky about this, but it's a couple of years old now, so figured I'd ask again.

Building a hyper-converged FatTwin setup from Supermicro. Initial disks are 4x Micron S630DC 800GB 12Gbs SAS SSDs per node, RAID10. They come with an onboard LSI 3008 12GB/s SAS controller. So, the question is whether or not that is good enough - based on the sticky SW recommends using their Cache vs. RAID onboard - or to go with an LSI 3108 RAID controller.

Thanks,

Kevin
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
Post Reply