StarWind Software

Hello

i'm testing Starwind Virtual SAN v8 on 2 retired servers with the Free License and have a Problem with the L2 Cache Performance.
From what i read in the whitepapers the l2 cache with default settings (write-through mode) should improve read operations but in my tests this was not case.
i hobe this post is not too overloaded with information...

Here are the Config Details:

Hardware:

• Server: HP SE326M1
  Raid Controller: HP Smart Array P410 with 1GB Cache + BBU
  Disks: 24x600GB SAS 10k, 1x120GB SATA SSD (a old OCZ Vertex 3, just for testing the caching)
  CPU: 2xXeon X5660 (6x2.80GHz)
  RAM: 144GB
  
  iSCSI Client
  Server: HP SE316M1
  Raid Controller: HP Smart Array P410 with 1GB Cache + BBU
  CPU: 2xXeon L5520 (4x2.27GHz)
  RAM: 144GB

Storage Config:

• 2x600GB SAS 10k RAID1 for the OS
  22x600GB SAS 10k RAID10 Stripe Size 64KB
  1x120GB SATA SSD RAID0 Stripe Size 64KB (Disk for Cache testing)

Software:

• iSCSI Server OS: Server 2012 R2 fully patched
  iSCSI Client OS: Server 2012 R2 fully patched
  Starwind Version: 8.0.0.9781

Network Config (Server/Client):

• 2x1GBit NIC directly connected from Target to Client
  Everything except IPv4 on these nics is disabled, WINS/NetBIOS is disabled
  Jumbo Frames are set to 9014 Bytes on each NIC, Offloading Options are also active
  Each NIC is in a diffrent subnet
  MPIO for iSCSI Disks is activated and working

Starwind Disk Config

• 1x500GB Image on 22x600GB RAID10, L1 Cache 3GB Write-Through
  1x500GB Image on 22x600GB RAID10, L1 Cache 3GB Write-Through, L2 Cache Write-Through 50GB Image on RAID0 SSD
  1x50GB Image on RAID0 SSD, L1 Cache 3GB Write-Through

Benchmark Tests (IOMeter)

Disk Target Settings

• 1 Manager / 10 Worker (On the Host OS) or 5 Manager (5 Hyper-V VM's) / 2 Worker
  Maximum Disk Size 20971520
  # Of Outstanding IOs 64
  Ramp Up Time 0
  Run Time 2 Minutes

Access Specifications

• 4K; 100% Write; 100% Random
  4K; 100% Read; 100% Random
  512B; 100% Write; 100 Sequential (Max IOPS Write)
  512B; 100% Read; 100 Sequential (Max IOPS Read)
  512KB; 100% Read; 100% Sequential (Max Troughput Read)
  512KB; 100% Write; 100% Sequential (Max Troughput Write)

to measure/compare Performance Each Test was performed on:

• iSCSI Target Server 100GB RAM Disk
  iSCSI Target Server Host OS - DAS (Direct attached Storage)
  iSCSI Target Server Hyper-V VM's - DAS of the Target Server
  iSCSI Client Host OS - on iSCSI Target
  iSCSI Client Hyper-V VM's - on iSCSI Target

to setup the vm benchmark (1xiometer master vm + 5xbenchmark vm's) environment i used powershell to automate everything and to have the same settings for each benchmark

Each vm has:

• 2 vProcessors
  2GB RAM
  1x Differencing disk for booting the os from an server 2012 r2 core image
  1x Disk which is located on the storage i wan't to test.

Here are some of the Benmark result

4K; 100% Read; 100% Random


4K; 100% Write; 100% Random


512B; 100% Read; 100 Sequential (Max IOPS Read)


512B; 100% Write; 100 Sequential (Max IOPS Write)


512KB; 100% Read; 100% Sequential (Max Troughput Read)


512KB; 100% Write; 100% Sequential (Max Troughput Write)

After looking at the benchmark result (sorry for the confusing naming conventions ) i see

The SSD can provide ~21k 4k Random Read IOPS and ~11k 4k Random Write IOPS
The 22x600GB SAS RAID10 give me max ~14k Random Read IOPS and ~11k 4k Random Write IOPS

I also get the same performance over iSCSI (with a little more response time)


But if i compare the SSD vs 22x600GB SAS RAID10 vs 22x600GB SAS RAID10 + SSD Cache i have a huge performance impact
The Volume with L2 SSD Cache should have ~21k 4k Read IOPS or at least ~14k from the Raid10 but it goes down to ~1k also the Write Operations are a little degraded these should never pass the l2 cache with write-trough?

I also tested l2 in write-back mode, but it did not improve write iops.. (i know this will kill my ssd faster but that's ok)

Can anyone help me to understand why a volume with l2 cache is slower than without the cache? do i miss something?

Benchmark results - SSD vs 22x600GB SAS RAID10 vs 22x600GB SAS RAID10 + SSD Cache

4K; 100% Read; 100% Random


4K; 100% Write; 100% Random

I also would like to submit a feature request
Editing/Adding/Removing Cache Settings of existing volumes should be possible via GUI, editing XML Files is not funny (maybe you work on that already)

I have run a lot more tests if you need more benchmark results but i think thats enough for know

cheers

Hello sa86,

Thank you for your detailed explanation.

Could you tell me please build number you are testing?

Hello,

I only get the version number (alredy listed above) from the management console: Starwind Version: 8.0.0.9781 (are the last 4 digits the build number?)

cheers

Hello sa86,

At the moment we are testing experimental L2 cache algorithm.

To enabe it:
1. Please choose server, on which you want to enable it.
2. Click configuration tab.
3. Choose experimental features and click "switch to experimental modules".

We would be pleased, if you shared your results with a community.

Hello,

I am facing the same situation. When using an IOMeter test file that can fit into the L1 Cache (e.g. 500MB file with 1G L1 Cache), the performance is > 70K iops. But when using a file that cannot fit into the L1 Cache (e.g. 2G file with 1G L1 Cache and 100G L2 Cache), the performance dropped to ~1K.

However, when switched to Experiment mode, the performance was boosted back to ~ 60K iops. Does anyone know when the new L2 algorithm be released?

Thanks in advance
Ryan

Hello RyanNW,

New Algorithm of L2 cache should be reliesed approximately in 2 months.

Please follow our upcoming releases.

Thank you!