RAID Configuration

Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version

Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)

Post Reply
ctcline
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:10 pm

Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:37 pm

Hello,

I am setting up a new SW server. I will have 12 4TB drives. http://www.seagate.com/internal-hard-dr ... y-3-5-hdd/

I plan to use RAID 10, but is it better to have all these drives in one RAID volume or break them down into smaller volumes?

Thanks,
Chris
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:08 am

Go OBR10 (One Big RAID10). Reason is simple: with one RAID set you basically do aggregate all IOPS from all the spindles into one virtual volume. So
any aligned I/O will touch all of the drives providing you the best match performance. With split drive sets you'll end with so-called "islands of storage" basically
stealing IOPS from each one and being difficult to manage.
ctcline wrote:Hello,

I am setting up a new SW server. I will have 12 4TB drives. http://www.seagate.com/internal-hard-dr ... y-3-5-hdd/

I plan to use RAID 10, but is it better to have all these drives in one RAID volume or break them down into smaller volumes?

Thanks,
Chris
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
ctcline
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:10 pm

Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:32 am

Thanks Anton!
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:08 pm

You're welcomed :) Please share the numbers you'd manage to sqeeze from your config. Thank you!
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

Image
Post Reply