Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version
Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)
-
anton (staff)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
-
Contact:
Sat May 03, 2014 9:38 pm
Minor post-update (together with persistent flash cache). V8 we plan to publish Gold on May 12th will have only write-back flash cache.
Good news: integration with MSFT Storage Spaces is done so you can layer StarWind FLAT images on top of a tiered Storage Spaces (as a workaround).
We're done with actual implementation of our tiering just a bit late with intensive tests...
mphilli7823 wrote:So is auto tiering making it into V8?
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev
Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

-
oscaru
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:27 am
Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:30 am
Hello,
Is this feature planned on implementing?
I've been evaluating your Virtual SAN against Datacore, and that's the only feature deal breaker.
I also remember asking your team about using Storage Spaces Auto Tiering but they told me that hardware raid was preferred.
Is Storage Spaces with ReFS supported?
-
Oles (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:58 am
Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:59 pm
Just like was said integration with MSFT Storage Spaces is already implemented, so you can configure tiering there any put our flat image on top
Unfortunately native StarWind tearing is being tested right now, so we are still waiting on that to be released.
-
oscaru
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:27 am
Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:06 am
Hello Oles, thanks for your reply,
A few questions:
Oles (staff) wrote:Just like was said integration with MSFT Storage Spaces is already implemented, so you can configure
tiering there any put our flat image on top
Ok, I'll try this then on our PoC Servers. I think it is very good news.
Why flat image? why not an LSFS target? If we use flat image, I think we would lost all the "Io-Blender killer" magic. Wouldn't we?
On Server 2016 with new Storage Spaces, and ReFS 3.0, is still NTFS the preferred filesystem? 64KB blocks?
Unfortunately native StarWind tearing is being tested right now, so we are still waiting on that to be released.
So you can officially confirm it's a new feature on your roadmap. Any ETA on this?
-
Oles (staff)
- Staff
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:58 am
Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:26 am
Yes, we do have this feature in our roadmap, although there is no ETA for it yet. As soon as I will have any additional information about tearing feature, I will make sure to update the thread.
-
oscaru
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:27 am
Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:48 am
Just like was said integration with MSFT Storage Spaces is already implemented, so you can configure
tiering there any put our flat image on top

Ok, I'll try this then on our PoC Servers. I think it is very good news.
Why flat image? why not an LSFS target? If we use flat image, I think we would lost all the "Io-Blender killer" magic. Wouldn't we?
On Server 2016 with new Storage Spaces, and ReFS 3.0, is still NTFS the preferred filesystem? 64KB blocks?
-
anton (staff)
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
-
Contact:
Sat Mar 11, 2017 11:05 pm
Technically we don't care about file system at all. ReFS is log-structured by it's nature (with a hash sums enabled) so NTFS is preferred. We don't do any file system level I/O so file system is for file locking and allocation only.
oscaru wrote:Just like was said integration with MSFT Storage Spaces is already implemented, so you can configure
tiering there any put our flat image on top

Ok, I'll try this then on our PoC Servers. I think it is very good news.
Why flat image? why not an LSFS target? If we use flat image, I think we would lost all the "Io-Blender killer" magic. Wouldn't we?
On Server 2016 with new Storage Spaces, and ReFS 3.0, is still NTFS the preferred filesystem? 64KB blocks?
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev
Chief Technology Officer & Chief Architect, StarWind Software

-
oscaru
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:27 am
Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:55 pm
Hello Anton and Oles,
Thanks for your replies
I want to try Virtual San on top of a Server 2016 Tiered Storage Space (will this config be Starwind supported?)
Now it's clear that NTFS is preferred over ReFS
Current hardware is:
2 Proliant DL380p Gen8 Servers
2 Fusion-io ioDrive Duo 1.28 TB (one on each server)
6 Intel S3710 400GB SSD Drives in RAID 5
Hypervisor is ESXi 6.5
For the Virtual Disk should I use Flat or LSFS?
-
oscaru
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:27 am
Fri Mar 17, 2017 12:59 am
Thanks for the reply
Great read, and that was the response I was looking.
I'll use flat image then over this tiered storage space.